It looks like you're in . Would you like to see content relevant to your location?

You can change this anytime by selecting “Reset my location” in the footer.

Mapping PFAS movement across a regional flood control system

Filter projects by:

Market

  • Chemicals

  • Cities

    Cities EMIA

  • Commercial & Residential

    Mixed Use

    Office

    Residential

    Retail

  • District energy systems 

  • Education

    Colleges & Universities

    Schools

  • Energy

    Battery Energy Storage Systems

    Biomass

    Carbon capture utilization and storage

    EV charging

    Geothermal

    Heat pumps

    Hydrogen

    Hydropower

    Natural gas

    Nuclear

    Portfolio Decarbonization and Climate Resilience

    Solar

    Transmission and distribution

    Transportation decarbonization

    Wind

  • Healthcare

    Life Sciences

    Senior Living

  • Industrial

    Agriculture, Food & Beverage

    Automotive & Heavy Equipment & Machinery

    Data Centers & Digital Infrastructure

    High Performance Logistics

    Manufacturing

    Mining & Metals

    Pharmaceutical/Specialty Chemicals

    Pulp & Paper

  • Justice

  • Leisure

    Arts and Culture

    Hotels and Resorts

    Themed Entertainment and Mixed-Use

  • National Governments

    Buildings & Infrastructure

    Civil Works

    Disaster Resilience

    Energy

    Environment

    International Development

  • Oil and gas

  • Sports and Venues

    Collegiate

    Convention Centers

    Mega-Events

    Stadiums & Arenas

  • Transit Bus and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 

  • Transportation

    Air Cargo

    Aviation

    Bridges

    Connected and Autonomous Vehicles

    Freight Rail

    High-speed rail 

    Highways & Roads

    Light Rail

    Mass Transit

    Ports and Maritime

    Transportation decarbonization

    Tunnels

  • Water

    Dams & Hydropower

    Flood and coastal resilience

    Industrial Water

    Tunnels, Conveyance, Collection & Distribution

    Wastewater Treatment, Recovery and Reuse

    Water Treatment

    Watershed and Ecosystem Management

Service

  • Advisory

  • Alternative Delivery Models

  • Architecture and Design

    Architecture

    Asset Advisory

    Climate Adaptation

    Community Engagement

    Interior Architecture

    Landscape Architecture

    Planning

    Urbanism + Planning

  • Asset Management

  • Cities Solutions

  • Construction Management

  • Converged Resilience

  • Cost Management

  • Digital Infrastructure Services

  • Economics

  • Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing Solutions

  • Engineering

    Ground Engineering

  • Environmental Services

    Air Quality Consulting and Engineering

    Climate Resilience and Adaptation  

    Cultural Resources and Heritage Management 

    Digital EHS/ESG Solutions

    EHS Management Consulting and Compliance

    Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and Permitting

    Environmental Contracting

    Remediation, Restoration and Redevelopment

  • Finance

  • Industrial and Commercial Operations and Maintenance

  • IT and Cybersecurity

  • Mobilitics

  • Multinational Investment and Development

  • Pedestrian Modelling (North America)

  • Planning and Consulting

    Geospatial Services

    Pedestrian Modelling

  • Process Development & Implementation

  • Program Management

  • Public-Private Partnerships

  • Risk Management & Resilience

    Critical Infrastructure Protection

  • Simulation Models

    Rail Simulations

  • Strategic consulting

    People + Place Advisory

  • Tunnels, Trenchless Technology and Underground Infrastructure

  • Vertical Transportation Services (North America)

  • Visualization and Virtual Reality

Location

  • Africa

  • Algeria

  • Antarctica

  • Australia

  • Azerbaijan

  • Bahrain

  • Bangladesh

  • Belgium

  • Bolivia

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • Brazil

  • British West Indies

  • Canada

  • Caribbean-Puerto Rico

  • Chinese Mainland

  • Colombia

  • Croatia

  • Czech Republic

  • Egypt

  • Eritrea

  • Finland

  • France

  • Germany

  • Greece

  • Greenland

  • Haiti

  • Hong Kong

  • India

  • Indonesia

  • Iraq

  • Ireland

  • Italy

  • Japan

  • Kenya

  • Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

  • Kuwait

  • Liberia

  • Lithuania

  • Malaysia

  • Maldives

  • Mali

  • Malta

  • Mauritania

  • Mexico

  • Monaco

  • Mongolia

  • Montenegro

  • Myanmar

  • Netherlands

  • New Zealand | Aotearoa

  • Norway

  • Oman

  • Panama

  • Papua New Guinea

  • Peru

  • Philippines

  • Poland

  • Portugal

  • Qatar

  • Romania

  • Singapore

  • Slovakia

  • South Africa

  • South Korea

  • Spain

  • Sri Lanka

  • Sweden

  • Switzerland

  • Taiwan

  • Turkey

  • Ukraine

  • United Arab Emirates

  • United Kingdom

  • United States

  • Vietnam

  • Worldwide

  • Zambia

In the Twin Cities East Metro region of St. Paul Minnesota, PFAS contamination has been identified across surface water, in groundwater, and in drinking water aquifers that serve multiple local communities. Under contract with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), we developed an understanding of how contamination originating from historic disposal sites was moving through an engineered flood control system — and how that system was contributing to a regional spread of PFAS.

The stormwater management project, named Project 1007, was constructed in the late 1980s, and extends approximately 14 miles traversing waterways through multiple communities. Project 1007 includes open channels, pipes, storm sewers, dams, and interconnected surface and groundwater features. The purpose of Project 1007 was to provide flood protection, but its scale and connectivity raised a critical question: was the system also acting as a regional pathway for PFAS, allowing the spread of upstream contamination to drinking water wells?

MPCA faced complexities inherent to substantial legacy contaminant releases that were able to traverse a very large area via water infrastructure systems. PFAS migrated horizontally and vertically, transiting the built infrastructure across watershed boundaries, groundwater divides, and through multiple aquifers. Impacts extended far beyond a single site, requiring a robust investigation and comprehensive interpretation of multiple types of data that could withstand regulatory and public scrutiny and inform long-term decision making — without compromising flood control operations relied upon by communities facing combined flood management and PFAS challenges.

Comprehensive characterization across a 120-square-mile impacted region

We were engaged to deliver a large-scale PFAS assessment and feasibility study focused on understanding PFAS sources, pathways, and receptors across the 120-square mile region around the Project 1007 corridor. The work was structured to answer regional questions first and develop greater detail where necessary to support and advance remedial decisions.

The team conducted extensive investigation and characterization efforts for PFAS from multiple primary historical and secondary transported sources. AECOM teams sampled soil, sediment, surface water, surface water foams, biota, and groundwater across the region detailing PFAS impacts throughout the project area.

At the core of the program was the development and continual refinement of a comprehensive conceptual site model (CSM). This model integrated surface water conveyance, groundwater flow, and surface-to-groundwater interactions into a single, coherent geologically structured framework. It provided MPCA with a defensible, systemwide understanding of how PFAS migrates through both natural and engineered pathways — a distinct advantage using a watershed approach to a regional-scale problem.

“This feasibility study points the way forward with options for a more robust environmental cleanup to remove PFAS from surface water and groundwater while preventing the East Metro PFAS plume from spreading further.” –MPCA Official

Tracking PFAS vertically and horizontally across multiple aquifers and watersheds

The complexity of the investigation reflected the scale of the system. PFAS transport had to be evaluated across multiple depths, geologic units, and hydrologic conditions. Deep bedrock monitoring wells were installed using sonic drilling and vertical aquifer profiling to accurately define contaminant movement within and between aquifers. Sampling methods varied from deep groundwater pumping to surface water and biotic sampling, all designed to determine clear linkages between surface water features and drinking water aquifers. Taken a step further, planned forensic PFAS analysis will decipher unique chemistry signatures and defined zones of mixing from two primary historic source areas.

AECOM fully integrated surface water, groundwater, and PFAS fate-and-transport modeling with the complex CSM. We transcended limitations inherent to isolated local datasets and synthesized regional trends, time dependent movement, chemical changes in PFAS signatures, and the influence of the conveyance system as a whole. Calibrated against current conditions, collectively, these models offered predictive information on PFAS transport over the next 50 and 100 years, which was essential to guide long-term remedial solutions and region-wide decision-making.

Bench scale and pilot studies were incorporated to test separation and destruction technologies, positioned to inform feasibility-stage decisions. The field pilot was focused on near-source PFAS contaminated surface water and groundwater as one part of the overall remedial solution for the entire impacted East Metro. These tests were conducted while maintaining an investigation emphasis on understanding the system, reducing uncertainty, and identifying where intervention would be most effective if pursued. Our field pilot study results were released to the public by MPCA in May 2026 in the “Project

1007 Feasibility Study.” One component of the field pilot was focused on removing and concentrating PFAS from surface water and groundwater near a source. The efforts were successful in removing long-chain target PFAS by more than 95% and concentrating PFAS by 3 to 6 orders of magnitude. AECOM and other contractors further tested the performance of five types of PFAS destruction technologies on the concentrate. We also performed bench-scale testing, including rapid small-scale column tests (RSSCTs), to evaluate PFAS removal on water further from the source areas where drinking water protection is necessary.

The Feasibility Study performed a complete alternatives analysis, incorporating results from pilot and bench studies, to recommend a remedial alternative for East Metro. The feasibility study recommended source zone control to protect from ongoing migration, groundwater well extraction and treatment systems to provide safe drinking water supply, surface water treatment with in-situ permeable absorptive barriers to protect sediment, access restrictions to highly affected areas, and long-term monitoring of the cleanup.

Reduced uncertainty for long-term planning, funding, and regulatory decisions

The program delivered a systemwide, evidence-based understanding of PFAS movement across a large regional infrastructure network. The integrated conceptual site model and modeling framework clarified how PFAS travels from historic source areas through surface water and groundwater pathways, and how the flood control system contributes to downstream transport.

This work underpinned feasibility stage evaluations and targeted remedial concepts, including options designed to limit plume migration and support long-term groundwater resource protection. Importantly, the investigation informed decisions affecting drinking water aquifers serving multiple East Metro communities, using a consistent and defensible technical foundation.

This in-depth study created a shared understanding among multiple governing agencies managing water, infrastructure, and public health concerns across the region.

A replicable framework for managing PFAS in complex water systems

PFAS challenges increasingly intersect with large, aging infrastructure systems. Project 1007 demonstrates why watershed scale investigations are essential where flood control, surface water management, and drinking water protection overlap.

The methods applied — targeted PFAS characterization, integrated modeling, and a comprehensive conceptual site model — provide a replicable framework for other agencies facing PFAS impacts across complex conveyance systems.