It looks like you're in . Would you like to see content relevant to your location?

You can change this anytime by selecting “Reset my location” in the footer.

Testing practical ways to reduce PFAS in municipal wastewater systems across Massachusetts 

Filter projects by:

Market

  • Chemicals

  • Cities

    Cities EMIA

  • Commercial & Residential

    Mixed Use

    Office

    Residential

    Retail

  • District energy systems 

  • Education

    Colleges & Universities

    Schools

  • Energy

    Battery Energy Storage Systems

    Biomass

    Carbon capture utilization and storage

    EV charging

    Geothermal

    Heat pumps

    Hydrogen

    Hydropower

    Natural gas

    Nuclear

    Portfolio Decarbonization and Climate Resilience

    Solar

    Transmission and distribution

    Transportation decarbonization

    Wind

  • Healthcare

    Life Sciences

    Senior Living

  • Industrial

    Agriculture, Food & Beverage

    Automotive & Heavy Equipment & Machinery

    Data Centers & Digital Infrastructure

    High Performance Logistics

    Manufacturing

    Mining & Metals

    Pharmaceutical/Specialty Chemicals

    Pulp & Paper

  • Justice

  • Leisure

    Arts and Culture

    Hotels and Resorts

    Themed Entertainment and Mixed-Use

  • National Governments

    Buildings & Infrastructure

    Civil Works

    Disaster Resilience

    Energy

    Environment

    International Development

  • Oil and gas

  • PFAS

  • PFAS Advise and Manage 

  • PFAS Investigate and Analyze  

  • PFAS Prevent and Control  

  • PFAS Treat and Eliminate  

  • Sports and Venues

    Collegiate

    Convention Centers

    Mega-Events

    Stadiums & Arenas

  • Transit Bus and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) 

  • Transportation

    Air Cargo

    Aviation

    Bridges

    Connected and Autonomous Vehicles

    Freight Rail

    High-speed rail 

    Highways & Roads

    Light Rail

    Mass Transit

    Ports and Maritime

    Transportation decarbonization

    Tunnels

  • Water

    Dams & Hydropower

    Flood and coastal resilience

    Industrial Water

    Tunnels, Conveyance, Collection & Distribution

    Wastewater Treatment, Recovery and Reuse

    Water Treatment

    Watershed and Ecosystem Management

Service

  • Advisory

  • Alternative Delivery Models

  • Architecture and Design

    Architecture

    Asset Advisory

    Climate Adaptation

    Community Engagement

    Interior Architecture

    Landscape Architecture

    Planning

    Urbanism + Planning

  • Asset Management

  • Cities Solutions

  • Construction Management

  • Converged Resilience

  • Cost Management

  • Digital Infrastructure Services

  • Economics

  • Electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing Solutions

  • Engineering

    Ground Engineering

  • Environmental Services

    Air Quality Consulting and Engineering

    Climate Resilience and Adaptation  

    Cultural Resources and Heritage Management 

    Digital EHS/ESG Solutions

    EHS Management Consulting and Compliance

    Environmental and Social Impact Assessment and Permitting

    Environmental Contracting

    Remediation, Restoration and Redevelopment

  • Finance

  • Industrial and Commercial Operations and Maintenance

  • IT and Cybersecurity

  • Mobilitics

  • Multinational Investment and Development

  • Pedestrian Modelling (North America)

  • Planning and Consulting

    Geospatial Services

    Pedestrian Modelling

  • Process Development & Implementation

  • Program Management

  • Public-Private Partnerships

  • Risk Management & Resilience

    Critical Infrastructure Protection

  • Simulation Models

    Rail Simulations

  • Strategic consulting

    People + Place Advisory

  • Tunnels, Trenchless Technology and Underground Infrastructure

  • Vertical Transportation Services (North America)

  • Visualization and Virtual Reality

Location

  • Africa

  • Algeria

  • Antarctica

  • Australia

  • Azerbaijan

  • Bahrain

  • Bangladesh

  • Belgium

  • Bolivia

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina

  • Brazil

  • British West Indies

  • Canada

  • Caribbean-Puerto Rico

  • Chinese Mainland

  • Colombia

  • Croatia

  • Czech Republic

  • Egypt

  • Eritrea

  • Finland

  • France

  • Germany

  • Greece

  • Greenland

  • Haiti

  • Hong Kong

  • India

  • Indonesia

  • Iraq

  • Ireland

  • Italy

  • Japan

  • Kenya

  • Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

  • Kuwait

  • Liberia

  • Lithuania

  • Malaysia

  • Maldives

  • Mali

  • Malta

  • Mauritania

  • Mexico

  • Monaco

  • Mongolia

  • Montenegro

  • Myanmar

  • Netherlands

  • New Zealand | Aotearoa

  • Norway

  • Oman

  • Panama

  • Papua New Guinea

  • Peru

  • Philippines

  • Poland

  • Portugal

  • Qatar

  • Romania

  • Singapore

  • Slovakia

  • South Africa

  • South Korea

  • Spain

  • Sri Lanka

  • Sweden

  • Switzerland

  • Taiwan

  • Turkey

  • Ukraine

  • United Arab Emirates

  • United Kingdom

  • United States

  • Vietnam

  • Worldwide

  • Zambia

Persistent PFAS impacting municipal treatment systems 

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) present one of the most complex and persistent challenges in water management today. These synthetic chemicals are widely used in industrial and commercial products and are highly resistant to breakdown. As regulatory scrutiny increases, public agencies are under growing pressure to identify effective, reliable, and scalable ways to reduce PFAS releases to the environment.

Municipal wastewater treatment plants (publicly owned treatment works, or POTWs) play a critical role in managing wastewater from residential and commercial sources. However, PFAS entering these systems from diverse sources often pass through untreated, remaining in liquid effluent, biosolids, or air emissions. Since existing PFAS treatment options are still emerging technologies and have been mostly tested at defense sites or drinking water settings, this creates a significant challenge for environmental regulators seeking to understand how PFAS behave within existing POTWs and what interventions could meaningfully reduce their presence. 

The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) needed actionable, real-world data to inform future decisions. To that end, the agency aimed to evaluate multiple pilot-scale emerging PFAS reduction and destruction technologies at different POTWs. The work needed to be completed within a compressed timeframe, across multiple sites, and in a way that would generate credible performance data to support long‑term policy and investment decisions. 

A coordinated, multitechnology pilots under realworld conditions 

MassDEP selected AECOM to deliver a first‑of‑its‑kind pilot program focused on testing 11 PFAS treatment technologies at POTWs across Massachusetts. Our team designed and executed a coordinated program in partnership with CDM Smith. 

The approach was intentionally comprehensive and comparative. Rather than evaluating a single solution, the program examined a range of complementary technologies spanning PFAS separation and destruction. These pilots were implemented across both liquid and solid process streams, reflecting the multiple potential pathways through which PFAS move in wastewater treatment systems. 

Our teams led the planning, deployment, and execution of the pilots, ensuring consistency in performance evaluation while adapting to the operational realities of different facilities. The focus was on generating high‑quality, data‑driven insights under real‑world conditions, enabling MassDEP to directly compare technology performance, operational feasibility, and applicability across diverse waste streams. 

Managing complexity across sites, technologies, and PFAS behavior 

Several factors made the program notably complex. First, PFAS represents a large and diverse class of compounds, each behaving differently within treatment processes. Understanding not just removal efficiency but also the fate and transformation of PFAS across system inputs and outputs required a rigorous scientific evaluation approach. 

Second, the multi‑site, multi‑technology structure significantly increased coordination demands. Conducting seven pilot tests and a full-scale incinerator evaluation across different municipalities within a compressed timeframe required rapid deployment, close collaboration with facility operators and technology vendors, and careful management of logistics and data consistency. 

Third, no precedent, at this scale and scope, exists for evaluating PFAS treatment technologies at within operating municipal wastewater systems. By testing multiple technologies simultaneously in real‑world conditions, the program moved beyond theoretical performance claims to generate practical evidence that reflects how these solutions would potentially perform when integrated into existing infrastructure. 

Building evidence to support future PFAS decisions 

The pilot program is generating critical performance data that improves understanding of how PFAS behave within municipal wastewater treatment systems.The results are expected to inform future decision‑making for utilities in Massachusetts and beyond that are seeking practical approaches to managing PFAS. The program also supports a more evidence‑based pathway toward long‑term treatment solutions, reducing uncertainty for regulators and utilities facing increasing regulatory and public scrutiny. 

More broadly, the work helps advance strategies to protect water resources and improve environmental and public health outcomes by addressing PFAS at a critical point in the wastewater cycle. 

Creating lasting value as PFAS regulation and expectations evolve 

PFAS contamination is widely recognized as a long‑term environmental challenge rather than a short‑term compliance issue. Municipal wastewater systems will continue to receive PFAS from domestic and commercial sources, even as regulations evolve. 

This project builds a robust evidence base on the performance and feasibility of emerging PFAS treatment and destruction technologies. The ongoing pilot program will further contribute to knowledge and insights that will help guide future infrastructure investments, technology selection, and policy development, supporting more resilient and informed responses to PFAS challenges over time.